[SURBL-Discuss]

[David Hooton]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces at lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of John Wilcock
> Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 4:06 PM
> To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list
> Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss]
> 
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 16:02:33 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > 2.  Another question would be the name of the combined list.  Since
> > there would be three or more lists, someone had suggested a name
> > of "all" before.  That sounds good to me unless there are other
> > suggestions.
> 
> This could potentially lead to confusion if you subsequently add another
> list not included in the "all" for some reason. That may seem unlikely
> now, but who knows? How about "multi"?

How about surbl.surbl.org?  Being the primary rbl, this kinda makes sense :)

Also on the other points about how to respond - I suggest the different IP
per list as being smartest the octet based response is too non-specific.
This only leaves the question on how do we handle multiple listings :)

Cheers!!

Dave


========================================================================
 Pain free spam & virus protection by:          www.mailsecurity.net.au
 Forward undetected SPAM to:                   spam at mailsecurity.net.au
========================================================================