[SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: Re: ANTI-SURBL technique used by spammer

Raymond Dijkxhoorn raymond at prolocation.net
Thu May 20 12:32:24 CEST 2004


> I brought it up due to the possible bad uses of this technology.  It's
> possible for a spammer to use this service for free bandwidth for images and
> other content (flash, etc).
> This is just one of those things to hold on to and keep an eye out for, if
> the word get's out, the spammers might try and abuse it.  From the message
> boards, most people don't care what it's used for, except those using 40 GB
> per day in illegal movie downloads cause they choose to be a mirror.

> >> Are you aware of http://freecache.org ?
> >> Take a look here if not:
> >> http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/12/1635205.shtml?tid=126&tid=95
> >> Thanks!

We might tell them about SURBL and ask to implement caching only for non 
listed domains. Others implemented things like that allready. Jeff, can 
you take that actionpoint?


More information about the Discuss mailing list