[SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: Re: ANTI-SURBL technique used by spammer
csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Thu May 20 10:16:27 CEST 2004
>From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond at prolocation.net]
>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:32 AM
>To: Jeff Chan; SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Fwd: Re: ANTI-SURBL technique used by
>> I brought it up due to the possible bad uses of this
>> possible for a spammer to use this service for free
>bandwidth for images and
>> other content (flash, etc).
>> This is just one of those things to hold on to and keep an
>eye out for, if
>> the word get's out, the spammers might try and abuse it.
>From the message
>> boards, most people don't care what it's used for, except
>those using 40 GB
>> per day in illegal movie downloads cause they choose to be a mirror.
>> >> Are you aware of http://freecache.org ?
>> >> Take a look here if not:
>> >> http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/12/1635205.shtml?tid=126&tid=95
>> >> Thanks!
>We might tell them about SURBL and ask to implement caching
>only for non
>listed domains. Others implemented things like that allready.
>you take that actionpoint?
I think that is a fantastic idea! They want there service to be great. It
can't be if they are blacklisted. I second the motion to contact them. Can't
More information about the Discuss