[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: consensus list?
surbl at alexb.ch
Fri Nov 12 12:50:11 CET 2004
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Another possibility might be records that appear in
> SC and AB and WS and JP and OB
> I think we can nearly guarantee that those are 100% spam. :-)
> (Would want to check those that are in WS separately from JP,
> which is currently included in WS.)
> What other ways to combine lists might produce near zero
> FPs yet still hit most spam?
> Shall we just try some of them and see how well they work?
From my eval:
- JP & SC & AB have been 0 FP for me.
- OB more FPs than expected - the direct whitelisting site has been a
godsend. OB guys very fast.
- WS 0 FPs since last clean up. (as FP are not always made pubic its
hard to say)
- SC & AB are very slow in publishing new data - JP & WS beat them all
This would mean less subzones to reduce DNS queries overall allowing
faster SA processing
my vote: merge JP,SC,AB. - "safe.surb.org"
More information about the Discuss