[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: consensus list?

[Alex Broens]

Alex Broens wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
> 
>> Another possibility might be records that appear in
>>
>>   SC and AB and WS and JP and OB
>>
>> I think we can nearly guarantee that those are 100% spam.  :-)
>> (Would want to check those that are in WS separately from JP,
>> which is currently included in WS.)
>>
>> What other ways to combine lists might produce near zero
>> FPs yet still hit most spam?
>>
>> Shall we just try some of them and see how well they work?
>>
>> Comments?
> 
> 
>  From my eval:
> 
> - JP & SC & AB have been 0 FP for me.
> 
> - OB more FPs than expected - the direct whitelisting site has been a 
> godsend. OB guys very fast.
> 
> - WS 0 FPs since last clean up. (as FP are not always made pubic its 
> hard to say)
> 
> - SC & AB are very slow in publishing new data - JP & WS beat them all
> 
> This would mean less subzones to reduce DNS queries overall allowing 
> faster SA processing
> 
> my vote: merge JP,SC,AB. - "safe.surb.org"
> 

Sorry, forgot to add PH to  "safe.surbl.org"