[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: consensus list?
jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Nov 12 14:11:50 CET 2004
On Friday, November 12, 2004, 4:03:26 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
>> - JP & SC & AB have been 0 FP for me.
>> - OB more FPs than expected - the direct whitelisting site has been a
>> godsend. OB guys very fast.
>> - WS 0 FPs since last clean up. (as FP are not always made pubic its
>> hard to say)
>> - SC & AB are very slow in publishing new data - JP & WS beat them all
>> This would mean less subzones to reduce DNS queries overall allowing
>> faster SA processing
>> my vote: merge JP,SC,AB. - "safe.surb.org"
> Sorry, forgot to add PH to "safe.surbl.org"
Thanks for the feedback on the lists Alex! "And"ing some of them
together should reduce the FPs. For example, even if OB or WS
had FPs, "and"ing them with SC or AB would reduce the FP levels.
Unfortunately it also lowers the spam detection rates.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss