[SURBL-Discuss] general questions.....

Joe Zitnik JZitnik at hfcc.net
Thu Nov 18 23:45:37 CET 2004

Not us.  THings are holding pretty steady.  Two days 43,000 e-mails,
32,000 spam (Each rounded up about a hundred).  That's about par for the
course for us.

>>> Lindsay Snider <lindsay at pa.net> 11/18/2004 5:08:55 PM >>>
On Thursday 18 November 2004 03:13 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Have any of you seen fewer spams? I don't see many these days.

Our graphs show the rates decreasing.

I'm not sure what other factors could be causing the graphs to tend
but I do know the mail volume has increased and the code rbl/block code
not changed.

> About 15% of the spams I get are not in SURBL, but are by the time I
try to
> add :)
> I have not done any study of domains that continue to try to spam
> being in SURBL. Any numbers on these? Possibly the most/longest hit
> in SURBL lookups??

I also haven't done a study recently but I could contribute data for
if we wanted to study any of it.

Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.surbl.org 

More information about the Discuss mailing list