[SURBL-Discuss] SC manual blacklist pruned
jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Nov 19 11:32:26 CET 2004
On Thursday, November 18, 2004, 6:49:26 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Note that cleaning up the manual blacklist is not the same
>> as whitelisting. Any record that comes off the manual
>> blacklist can be manually or automatically blacklisted again
>> in future at any time if it appears in spams again. So it's
>> not at all a "free pass" to spammers or anything like that.
> If I understand it correctly what you have there is actually a
> "SC accelerator list", not really a blacklist.
Yes and no. If I add something to the manual blacklist,
it gets listed within a few minutes if it wasn't already.
It doesn't change any report counts; it forces any new
records onto sc.
An accelerator list would perhaps lower thresholds,
increase hit counts, etc. This is a simple "or"-type
> And the normal
> procedure to list SC "votes" in sc.surbl.org would work even
> with an empty "SC accelerator list".
>> It just means some domains that are unusable and don't appear
>> in any recent spams are no longer included on SC for now. If
>> they get used again, they'll get listed again.
> You never get unusable SC "votes", if a domain is unusable SC
> cannot send a report, and if SC doesn't send a report, SURBL is
> not affected. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Correct, but there are other rare errors in SpamCop, such as
when URIs or domains don't get extracted properly, usually
due to obfuscation. If I see that happening with my personal
SpamCop reports, and I'm sure the message is a spam, then I
add the domain to the manual blacklist. Usually I try to
mention the lack of detection to the SpamCop deputies also.
I hope others do similarly.
> The "accelerator list" is no problem, but it's a cute feature.
It's mainly meant to address too few reports, slow reporting,
or processing errors.
P.S. I hope everyone is reporting fresh spams to SpamCop.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss