[SURBL-Discuss] general questions.....
jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Nov 19 11:48:15 CET 2004
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 2:38:20 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2004, 12:13:26 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> About 15% of the spams I get are not in SURBL, but are by the time I try to
>> add :)
> Ask Terry Sullivan sometime what the theoretical maximum
> detection rate of a collective spam classification system might
> be. He had some research showing it maxes out at around 85%.
(That should read "collaborative" for "collective".
Pretty much the same meaning though: i.e. when multiple
people decide what's spam.)
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss