[SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com

[Jeff Chan]

On Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:22:34 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Patrik Nilsson [mailto:patrik at patrik.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:55 PM
>>To: SURBL Discussion list
>>Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Help classify quickinspirations.com
>>
>>
>>At 09:25 2004-09-30 -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
>>> > quickinspirations.com
>>>
>>>When this one came up here, every person who received it classified it
>>>as spam when I asked and so it remains that in my mind.
>>
>>And I still haven't seen any response actually arguing a real 
>>reason why 
>>quickinspirations.com should be whitelisted.
>>
>>We're not just whitelisting domains because someone, who doesn't even 
>>bother to argue why, asks us to, do we?
>>
>>"This is reported as spam, looks like spam and smells like 
>>spam, but we 
>>will whitelist it just because it might be caught by other 
>>antispam systems 
>>anyway" isn't a very convincing argument.
>>

> ^LOL^ Oh I'm not comenting in that one ;)

> I'll let Jeff explain it, because I still don't understand this one. 

The question is whether they have legitimate uses.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."