[SURBL-Discuss] namesdatabase . com

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sat Oct 2 13:28:27 CEST 2004


On Saturday, October 2, 2004, 3:32:45 AM, Bitz Bitz wrote:
> namesdatabase . com

> Listed at WS.

> It has legit uses, should be whitelisted?

FWIW the 11 NANAS hits for this domain seem to come from
the same or similar IP addresses: 63.211.182.47

The Names Database THENAMESDATABASE-BLK-1 (NET-63-211-182-32-1)
                                  63.211.182.32 - 63.211.182.47

Which could be trivially blocked by an RBL, but is
not listed by SBL or any other RBL as a /28.  (Three RBLs
list the entire Level3 /16 which is arguably ridiculous.)

  http://www.openrbl.org/ip/63/211/182/47.htm

> # @ISP/blackholes.us: 63.211/16: 553 ISP LEVEL3 -
> http://hatcheck.org/google?level3;
> http://hatcheck.org/sbl?level3; ISP LEVEL3-NOGENUITY -
> http://hatcheck.org/google?level3-nogenuity; http://hatch
> [Blockparade]

> # DRBL/drbl.all: 63.211/16: 553 DRBL weight: 0.6;
> vote.drbl.vimas.kiev.ua at ns.vimas.kiev.ua/0.6

> # BLARS/block.blars.org: INET 127.3.0.0

To me that says they're probably not a zombie user, which
is a count against listing.

Bitz, what kind of legitimate uses do they have?

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list