[SPAM-TAG] RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist kit . net

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Tue Oct 5 07:12:01 CEST 2004


On Monday, October 4, 2004, 10:37:18 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>From: Yves Junqueira [mailto:yves.junqueira at gmail.com]
>>On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 07:29:14 -0700, Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> wrote:

>>> The policy is: if it has legitimate uses, then don't list.
>>> 
>>> Can you provide some examples of legitimate sites on kit.net
>>> (preferably in English)?

>>Sorry, I couldn't find any in english.
>>
>>http://www.tmabc.kit.net - 
>>http://www.1mais1.kit.net  - They seem good people. They are a group
>>of volunteers that assist home less people. Doesn't seem to be a scam.
>>
>>I'd suggest whitelisting kit.net if, and only if, you are really
>>strict to the policy. They do host many trojans and scam sites there.

> Why not treat them like the tld is 'kit.net' and list on subdomains?

That's an interesting suggestion, but we're not set up to do that
currently.  We chose to go after registrar domains since they
are the ones that set the spam policies for a given domain.
If subdomains are spammy, then it's the responsibility of the
parent domain to police it.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list