[SURBL-Discuss] Doesn't multi contain everything from WS and others?

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Oct 14 03:34:07 CEST 2004


On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 5:43:45 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> It seems a timing issue. On the rsync server i noticed the multi list is a
> little outdated. Most likely the generation scripts are stalled? Jeff, can 
> you look into this?

There are a couple issues. One is that I'm slightly updating
the script that creates multi to better detect when the
individual lists update.  (That's where that shell script
question came from.)  The other is that I added a lock file to
prevent that script from running when the sc data was being
generated.  I added that due to a condition where the sc data
was empty when multi needed it.  I'm adjusting these things
now and they seem to be working better, but of course I'll
keep checking them.

All this will be corrected when I rewrite things in a cleaner,
simpler and more integrated way, which is on my list of things to
do.  Second versions are usually better than the first, due
to seeing how things could be done better.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list