[SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com

[Chris Santerre]

I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I added has been in
there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this guys list nilly
willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took his 100 recent
changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were in question. 

So the original file was looked thru by me and never changed. And only 80 or
so were added out of the 100 latest updated. I probably won't look at this
again for another 2 months as it takes a while to go thru them. 

I don't add anything blindly. I don't want FPs either. 

Why, is greatnow.com being listed a problem? 

"Talk to me Goose!"

--Chris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:39 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
>
>
>On Friday, October 22, 2004, 7:21:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll add his last 100 changes as well. 
>
>> --Chris
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo at hesketh.com]
>>>Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:01 AM
>>>To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>>>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yep - confirmed. 'greatnow.com' is listed.
>>>
>>>http://www.jayallen.org/comment_spam/blacklist.txt
>
>I really think we should discuss AND TEST adding new data sources
>before adding them to WS or any other list.  There seem to be
>a lot of FPs in this blog list.
>
>If we don't discuss and test these first, I may just remove them
>from WS.
>
>Jeff C.
>--
>"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
>