[SURBL-Discuss] Nice policy! Adding to UC not WS.

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Oct 25 21:02:39 CEST 2004


On Monday, October 25, 2004, 8:45:24 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I have an SURBL submission from a VERY reputible person. With a very good
> explanation as to how the email address spam'd should NEVER have gotten this
> email. Now according to WS policy it would NOT be listed because it may have
> legit uses. Therefore I'm adding it to UC not WS. 

Actually that's more of a SURBL policy than a WS one.
We don't want false positives on SURBLs because they
make the lists less usable.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list