[SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Oct 25 23:00:58 CEST 2004


On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:23:32 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]

>>If we're thinking about setting up a blog list (as we were
>>earlier), then it might be useful to test the data before using
>>it, don't you agree?
>>
>>I don't see how dumping lists with arbitrary FPs onto UC helps
>>either UC or SURBLs.  In fact it's one of the bad things we
>>predicted: that a grey list would become a dumping ground with
>>some FPs and some domains that belong on a blocklist, all sitting
>>there underclassified, unchecked or ignored.

> They are NOT going unchecked. UC is still in beta form right now. So we are
> testing. Most people have no clue where the server is as it is NOT part of
> SURBL, so UC.SURBL.ORG doesn't work. Not a dumping ground at all. It will be
> as active as WS. 

> I fully intend to mirror most of what goes into WS into UC. UC will simply
> have a different policy. Grey domains need to be considered. UC will do
> that. You said yourself earlier you didn't want to be any part of a list
> that handled grey domains. That it would waste time. So you don't have to
> worry about UC. 

> UC will get as much attention to detail as I put into WS. I just won't
> delete grey domains, like I do now. I will instead list then in UC. 

How about a blog spam SURBL?  Or is all blog spam grey?

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list