[SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com

[Chris Santerre]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:01 PM
>To: SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
>
>
>On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:23:32 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>
>>>If we're thinking about setting up a blog list (as we were
>>>earlier), then it might be useful to test the data before using
>>>it, don't you agree?
>>>
>>>I don't see how dumping lists with arbitrary FPs onto UC helps
>>>either UC or SURBLs.  In fact it's one of the bad things we
>>>predicted: that a grey list would become a dumping ground with
>>>some FPs and some domains that belong on a blocklist, all sitting
>>>there underclassified, unchecked or ignored.
>
>> They are NOT going unchecked. UC is still in beta form right 
>now. So we are
>> testing. Most people have no clue where the server is as it 
>is NOT part of
>> SURBL, so UC.SURBL.ORG doesn't work. Not a dumping ground at 
>all. It will be
>> as active as WS. 
>
>> I fully intend to mirror most of what goes into WS into UC. 
>UC will simply
>> have a different policy. Grey domains need to be considered. 
>UC will do
>> that. You said yourself earlier you didn't want to be any 
>part of a list
>> that handled grey domains. That it would waste time. So you 
>don't have to
>> worry about UC. 
>
>> UC will get as much attention to detail as I put into WS. I 
>just won't
>> delete grey domains, like I do now. I will instead list then in UC. 
>
>How about a blog spam SURBL?  Or is all blog spam grey?

You want a seperate list for blog spammers? Have at it. I'll add what I can
to it. 

--Chris