[SURBL-Discuss] Spamassassin and SpamCopURI

Frank Tore Johansen frankj at osc.no
Tue Oct 26 17:08:22 CEST 2004


Thanks.  I did the changes you illustrated below (into 
spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf).  The "make test" errors went away, so I went 
ahead and did "make install" of SpamAssassin 2.64, as well as a reinstall 
of SpamCopURI-0.22 (just in case).  I also removed the old override in 
local.cf and skip_rbl_checks is still set to 0.

Unfortunatedly I don't get hits on RBL checks anymore.  I verified this by 
forwarding a mail with a verified listed domain (in ws.surbl.org and 
multi.surbl.org).  I'm not using spamc/spamd.  (And all the non-RBL checks 
still work fine.)

Any ideas on how I go about figuring out why RBL checks turned themselves 
off on the upgrade?  How can I get any kind of debug log?

-Frank.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:

> On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 1:40:05 AM, Frank Johansen wrote:
>> Hi, I'm in the progress of upgrading SA from 2.63 to 2.64 and SpamCopURI
>> from 0.19 to 0.22.
>
> The syntax for the SpamCopURI 0.22 rules is new to reflect use of
> the combined list multi.surbl.org, so please update them to look
> like these.  Also please add two lists, AB and JP, to the 0.22
> configs:
>
> uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+2')
> describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL      Has URI in SC at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  net
>
> uri WS_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+4')
> describe WS_URI_RBL      Has URI in WS at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags WS_URI_RBL net
>
> uri PH_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+8')
> describe PH_URI_RBL      Has URI in PH at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags PH_URI_RBL net
>
> uri OB_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+16')
> describe OB_URI_RBL      Has URI in OB at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags OB_URI_RBL net
>
> uri AB_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+32')
> describe AB_URI_RBL      Has URI in AB at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags AB_URI_RBL net
>
> uri JP_URI_RBL           eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+64')
> describe JP_URI_RBL      Has URI in JP at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
> tflags JP_URI_RBL net
>
> score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL  4.0
> score WS_URI_RBL  1.5
> score PH_URI_RBL  3.0
> score OB_URI_RBL  2.2
> score AB_URI_RBL  3.0
> score JP_URI_RBL  2.5
>
> Please remove any old rules referring to lists other than
> multi.surbl.org (i.e. sc.surbl.org, ws.surbl.org should no longer
> be used since they're in multi now).
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Jeff C.
> --
> "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
>


More information about the Discuss mailing list