[SURBL-Discuss] To MUNGE to not to MUNGE

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Wed Sep 1 13:55:02 CEST 2004


On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:49:16 AM, David Sparks wrote:
> William Stearns wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Ryan Thompson wrote:
>>>Oh, by the way, SpamAssassin, at least (and all others that I'm aware
>>>of), will not even parse body tokens of the form domain.com or 127.0.0.2

>>       Spamassassin doesn't, but less sophisticated filters may not be so 
>> smart.

> Several MUA's in common use take a bare www.example.com/pills.html and 
> make it a "clickable" link.

> So how is it being more smart and sophisticated to miss these URIs?  :)

IIRC SA 3 may treat www.domain.com as a URI.  The SA folks
probably know if this is the case, or one could check the source
code. 

However domain.com probably is not treated as a URI.

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list