[SURBL-Discuss] RE: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Sep 2 08:06:26 CEST 2004

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 6:53:41 AM, Rob McEwen wrote:
>>SO I say, go ahead and add them.

> Chris... where have you been? We have had extensive discussions recently
> where we all concluded that we have to make getting the FPs down a priority
> and the only way to do this is to (gulp), allow some graymarketers loose
> (those who do a some or much spamming but who do have some legitimate uses).
> It wasn't an easy decision... but the need to get SURBL to a "set it and
> forget it" point is mission critical.

I agree about reducing FPs, but I'm not sure if adding blog
spammers would increase or decrease that.  I guess I'm not
familiar with them.

Are the blog spammers scammers and criminals like professional
mail spammers?  Do they advertise legitimate sites, or the usual
pill and mortgage sites in Korea, China and Brazil?

Jeff C.

More information about the Discuss mailing list