[SURBL-Discuss] Proposing a greylist
Chris Santerre
csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Thu Sep 2 15:08:02 CEST 2004
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob McEwen [mailto:rob at powerviewsystems.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 1:29 PM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Proposing a greylist
>
>
>> Good idea. Let's do it. I'll be able to submit more domains to *this*
>> list than I could to ws. It will finally give meaning to that pile of
>> domains I always end up with and get ulcers trying to
>classify as black
>> or white.
>
>For the record... and just to be sure... I vote that
>unconfirmed.surbl.org NOT contain those things that we tend to
>agree with as NOT being spam, but sometimes gets reported as
>spam by end users.
>
>For example, people sometimes forget that they really DID
>subscribe to a particular newsletter, and then complain about
>it as being spam. The SallyFoster.com site is a great example
>where a one-time e-mail is sent only at the request of a
>relative or friend. Another example is a legitimate newsletter
>with an open-loop signup page where someone signed up their
>friends or enemies (without their knowledge) for the
>newsletter.... not good practice, but if it represents a tiny
>fraction of that newletter's distribution, the newsletter is
>otherwise totally opt-in, and there are few to none NANAS
>hits... then this kind of stuff shouldn't get on the greylist.
>
>Instead, unconfirmed.surbl.org ought to be for those really
>hard to classify things that ARE getting NANAS hits, that DO
>hit spamtraps, but that have enough legitimate purposes to not
>get placed in the regular SURBL lists.
>
>If this advice is not heeded, then unconfirmed.surbl.org will
>get too convoluted and too bulky to be effective.
>
>Rob McEwen
>
Before reading the other new posts in this thread, I have to say one big
"Hell Yeah!" to this. It's kind of what I meant, and I assumed everyone
thought the same. I shouldn't have done that.
Yes anyone added to an unclasified MUST be VERY spammy! and have legit hits.
I'm not talking about someone who may have purchased a bad list, or got
screwed by a marketer one time. an unclasified domain still has to hit
everything that would put it on a blacklist.
--Chris (Une Rafale De Tubes!)
More information about the Discuss
mailing list