[SURBL-Discuss] Proposing a greylist

[Chris Santerre]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bret Miller [mailto:bret.miller at wcg.org]
>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 1:45 PM
>To: rob at powerviewsystems.com; SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Proposing a greylist
>
>
>OK, OK... How about an "evilmulti" that included "unconfirmed", which
>would increase surbl's data size and processing-- having to build two
>multi lists, but would significantly reduce DNS query traffic since
>those using the "unconfirmed" list and the "multi" list could use a
>single query per URI instead of 2 per URI.
>
>Bret


I say that can be determined after testing the list in general. But for now,
mutli is no no. :)

Now, lets say for giggles Jeff says, "OK I agree to test this theory."
Uh....how do we submit to it? Where is it? And who took my screwdrivers from
my basement? 

--Chris