[SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist all Bonded Senders?

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sat Sep 4 03:03:35 CEST 2004


On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 2:01:05 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>> >> How about www.senderbase.org ?

>> > I would not go that way, people can test on senderbase/bonded sender, and 
>> > just like habaes this will be abused also. In my SA setup the above scores 
>> > are also taken, and will bias the score...

>> Are any of them grey?   Bonded sender claims they have paid out
>> only tiny amounts of bonds due to violations.
>> 
>> Remember that not everyone uses SA.  I'd like to have a list of
>> non-spammers to exclude from SURBLs.

> I have requested rsync access on the zones, they have responded to that 
> and we will setup a feed, afterwards i can have a look on the zones, and 
> check a little better. More indepth... 

Sounds perfectly reasonable.  We can check if any of their
customers hit our lists.

Are there any other nominally whitehatting organizations
we could check into?  Are there any real whitehat
certification groups?

What is senderbase?

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list