[SURBL-Discuss] Setting SpamAssassin scores for SURBL lists

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Tue Sep 7 16:17:56 CEST 2004


On Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 6:42:05 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> There is one SARE ninja testing guru that will come online with SURBL when
> 3.0 is released. I expect a LOT of testing, because he is addicted to it :)
> He's actually been trying to work with another ninja to test for SURBL FPs
> already. But the initial tests failed :(

> So we should have a really great tester online soon.

Excellent news!

> With human errors, I think an SO ratio of 99% is pretty cool. OF course we
> won't even have that unless we strive for zero FPs. Its a goal. I hand check
> pretty much everything, but sometimes one slips by :)

> --Chris 

It's good have have more testing to try to close the loop
by checking things.  Things are still a little too open
ended probably.  Additional feedback and testing should
be able to improve our accuracy.

Jeff C.



More information about the Discuss mailing list