[SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist all Bonded Senders?

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Tue Sep 7 17:37:49 CEST 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 5:04 AM
>To: SURBL Discuss
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist all Bonded Senders?
>On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 2:01:05 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
>>> >> How about www.senderbase.org ?
>>> > I would not go that way, people can test on 
>senderbase/bonded sender, and 
>>> > just like habaes this will be abused also. In my SA setup 
>the above scores 
>>> > are also taken, and will bias the score...
>>> Are any of them grey?   Bonded sender claims they have paid out
>>> only tiny amounts of bonds due to violations.
>>> Remember that not everyone uses SA.  I'd like to have a list of
>>> non-spammers to exclude from SURBLs.
>> I have requested rsync access on the zones, they have 
>responded to that 
>> and we will setup a feed, afterwards i can have a look on 
>the zones, and 
>> check a little better. More indepth... 
>Sounds perfectly reasonable.  We can check if any of their
>customers hit our lists.
>Are there any other nominally whitehatting organizations
>we could check into?  Are there any real whitehat
>certification groups?

Anyone who mentions DMA will be introduced to my hockey stick!

Just want to make sure we are all clear on that one ;)

-note- DMA = Direct Marketers Assoc. = the evil empire


More information about the Discuss mailing list