[SURBL-Discuss] Need help checking FP list from Theo

Doc Schneider maddoc at maddoc.net
Tue Sep 7 18:18:31 CEST 2004


Chris Santerre wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 4:54 AM
>>To: SURBL Discussion list
>>Cc: postmaster at outblaze.com
>>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Need help checking FP list from Theo
>>
>>
>>On Monday, September 6, 2004, 11:10:50 PM, Ryan Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>bis1bp.com          FP: Hmm... Domain doesn't resolve thanks 
>>
>>to their not
>>
>>>                    being any authoritative nameservers.
>>>                    It's 87 days old. If this was really 
>>
>>found in ham,
>>
>>>                    I'd say de-list.
>>
>>I found this one in the original message and it's part of a
>>security mailing list mention of a phishing site.  Removing
> 
>>from whitelist.
> 
>> http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/Jun/0268.html
>>
>>It no longer resolves but should be fine to block on IMO.
>>
>>Jeff C.
> 
> 
> Dang it, I replied to a piece of this thread out of order :)
> 
> I'll try to reply to all of them now...
> 
> I am +1 for whitelisting .edu. Heck I'm borderline skiplisting them in the
> hard code. 
> 
> Once we get these all settled, I'd like to find how they all got in here in
> the first place! seti.org being listed put up red flags for me! Who put that
> in here? Even if it was me, I should be flogged! 
> 
> Hold on to your chairs, but I agree with Jeff! :) Cleanup is great, but how
> do things like yale and seti get listed in the first place????
> 

I'm totally shocked that yale and seti could even be considered "spammy"

And can I help with the flogging? <BOFH>

8*))

-Doc (SA/SARE/SURBL - Ninja)


More information about the Discuss mailing list