[SURBL-Discuss] whitelist senderbase top domains?

Alex Broens surbl at alexb.ch
Fri Sep 10 12:09:35 CEST 2004


Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2004, 2:40:43 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
> 
>>Jeff Chan wrote:
>>
>>>>bezeqint.net
>>>>blueyonder.co.uk
>>>>hinet.net
>>>>prod-infinitum.com.mx
> 
> 
>>I don't see them as "abused briefly"
>>personally I seem them as a plague and as 99% free webmailers indirectly 
>>or diretly contribute to the SCAM/SPAM/Trash floods.
> 
> 
>>If "free" web mail would cost $5/annum, Nigeria would have to search for 
>>new export products.
> 
> 
>>if Open Relays, Zombies, Bogons, Spamhauses etc are a source
>>of spam... IMHO the list aboves rates a new category.
> 
> 
> That's interesting, but it's not the question.  The
> question is do these ISP' own domain names appear as
> URIs in spams?

if you define 409's and all kinds of beggar-mail as 
spam/unsolicited/notrequested, yes...
though I don't have any msgs to prove it right now...

Alex

Alex







More information about the Discuss mailing list