[SURBL-Discuss] Additional PJ info

Bill Landry billl at pointshare.com
Sun Sep 19 16:39:28 CEST 2004

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Chan" <jeffc at surbl.org>

> All of this leads me to think that the Prolocation and
> JW data are really a major operation of their own and
> deserve to have their own list.
> By the way I'm proposing to call the list JP instead of
> PJ, since PJ is too similar to PH.  The difference should
> result in less confusion.
> Comments?

Thanks, Jeff, for the additional background information.  I would agree that
JP should be run as a separate list.  This will allow us the flexibility to
weight the different lists according to their accuracy and our individual
levels of FP tolerance in our own environments.


More information about the Discuss mailing list