[SURBL-Discuss] Please test MailPolice Fraud list

Martin martin.lyberg at idkommunikation.com
Thu Sep 23 13:41:54 CEST 2004


Jeff Chan wrote:

> That's correct.  fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com is not part of multi
> or even a SURBL at this point, so it has no bitmask.  It's a
> separate, external list.  If we like the data, we will add it
> into PH in multi.

Right, thanks for clarifying.

> ab.surbl.org is good to add, but jp doesn't exist until
> Monday.  :-)

Alright, Will it be harmless to have JP activated even though it's not 
in use yet?

> Also descriptions like:
> 
>   URI's domain appears in http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ab
> 
> would be better.

Good idea, but the '#' sign is getting ignored by the system as it 
thinks i've commented out the characters next to it :)

/ Martin



More information about the Discuss mailing list