[SURBL-Discuss] Re: [SURBL-Announce] ANNOUNCE: Adding new JP list to multi.surbl.org

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Sep 24 18:02:07 CEST 2004


On Friday, September 24, 2004, 8:51:52 AM, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:58:42 -0700, Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> wrote:

>> OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
[...]
>>  76.754  78.9448   0.0178    1.000   0.80    0.00  URIBL_OB_SURBL
>>  77.230  79.4340   0.0208    1.000   0.60    1.00  URIBL_PJ_SURBL
[...]
>>  82.119  84.4600   0.1367    0.998   0.40    0.00  URIBL_WS_SURBL


> Do you have a current reasonable scoring for jp? (that is, considering
> that, for now, this score will be added to the ws score, since, until
> SA3.1, jp will be a subset of ws.

Since OB and JP have about the same spam detection and false
positive rates, their scores should probably be somewhat similar.

Not sure what to recommend in terms of scoring JP as added
to WS, but JP should probably be scored higher than WS.

Cheers,

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list