[SURBL-Discuss] OB FPs

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Sep 26 02:33:41 CEST 2004

On Saturday, September 25, 2004, 3:53:52 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
> While I always read how reliable OB should be, of the few WL requests 
> I've triggered, all except 1 were from OB.

> These were pretty ugly ones indeed, an Adobe child site, a Genuine 
> abused Webmail site, etc, etc.

> juts wondering....

The slice of Outblaze data we get is from their extensive
spamtraps, filtered by recentness of registration and by
volume of messages.

It's generally a good approach, but as we can see some FPs get
in, despite that filtering and despite our whitelisting, etc.

Perhaps Yusuf of Outblaze can comment further.

Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

More information about the Discuss mailing list