[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Sep 26 11:14:45 CEST 2004


On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 1:46:03 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
> Ryan Thompson wrote:

>> Hey everybody,
>> 
>> Does this look better?        http://ry.ca/geturi/results.html
>> 
>> There are many improvements to the output. Even *I'm* impressed.
>> 
>> It's getting close to feature freeze/release time again, methinks, to
>> put these improvements into a stable release. So, if anyone has anything
>> they'd like to see right away, please speak now.  :-)

> Great!

> Why not add Spamhaus' XBL zone lookups?

XBL is about mail senders, open relays, open proxies, etc.
While it may be interesting to check header addresses for
a given message against XBL, strictly speaking it's the
URI domain servers and name servers that are most relevant
to SURBLs.  Those are in SBL.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list