[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Sep 26 11:14:45 CEST 2004

On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 1:46:03 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
> Ryan Thompson wrote:

>> Hey everybody,
>> Does this look better?        http://ry.ca/geturi/results.html
>> There are many improvements to the output. Even *I'm* impressed.
>> It's getting close to feature freeze/release time again, methinks, to
>> put these improvements into a stable release. So, if anyone has anything
>> they'd like to see right away, please speak now.  :-)

> Great!

> Why not add Spamhaus' XBL zone lookups?

XBL is about mail senders, open relays, open proxies, etc.
While it may be interesting to check header addresses for
a given message against XBL, strictly speaking it's the
URI domain servers and name servers that are most relevant
to SURBLs.  Those are in SBL.

Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

More information about the Discuss mailing list