[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy

Raymond Dijkxhoorn raymond at prolocation.net
Sun Sep 26 12:39:29 CEST 2004


>> Why not add Spamhaus' XBL zone lookups?

> The thought had only briefly crossed my mind.  Is XBL really a good
> resource for SURBL classification? I thought XBL just listed exploited
> systems and open HTTP proxies. Hmm. I suppose I could just code it up
> and run it on a bunch of mail to see what happens... Or I could just use
> the combined sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org list, I suppose.

I would really only use SBL, if you check agains XBL you could also test 
on DSBL, but we want to get the hardcore non-proxy spammers. The zombies 
are stopped with DSBL/XBL and alike anyway. Any thoughts?


More information about the Discuss mailing list