[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy
Ryan Thompson
ryan at sasknow.com
Sun Sep 26 19:36:26 CEST 2004
Jeff Chan wrote to SURBL Discuss:
> On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 2:16:45 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
>> If a spammy looking msg comes thru an exploited system IMO it would
>> qualify even more to be a SURBL inclusion as a genuine "marketer" would
>> not be expected to use exploited machines, right?
>
> That's definitely true, and one of the things I usually look
> for in SURBL listing candidates. (I thought you were referring
> to checking URI domains against XBL, which probably would not
> catch much.)
>
> XBL is an excellent list of spam senders, by far the biggest
> catcher of spam senders in my regular RBLs, so it probably
> would be good as a header check for GetURI also. Ryan can
> we make this a feature request?
Sure. Now it's making sense. :-) Fortunately, adding header checks will
be easy, because I'm already using the SpamAssassin engine.
- Ryan
--
Ryan Thompson <ryan at sasknow.com>
SaskNow Technologies - http://www.sasknow.com
901-1st Avenue North - Saskatoon, SK - S7K 1Y4
Tel: 306-664-3600 Fax: 306-244-7037 Saskatoon
Toll-Free: 877-727-5669 (877-SASKNOW) North America
More information about the Discuss
mailing list