[SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with SpamAssassin 3.0

alden at engineno9inc.com alden at engineno9inc.com
Sun Sep 26 20:12:06 CEST 2004


> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond at prolocation.net>
> Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with
> 	SpamAssassin 3.0
> To: SURBL Discussion list <discuss at lists.surbl.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0409261916300.22651 at mailbox.prolocation.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Hi!
>
>> I have been using the SURBL plugin with SA 2.64 successfully and have
>> just  upgraded SA to 3.0.  In the docs it states that it is best to
>> use  multi.surbl.org with 3.0.   Is this configured by default
>> somewhere or do I  need to add the rule to local.cf??
>
> This is enabled by default, of you have modules like Net::DNS installed.
>
>> I have been watching the spam processed so far this morning and I am
>> getting  hits on the lists I had configured with 2.64 but not multi
>> which is why I  ask.
>
> You still see the hits on the seperate lists.
>
> Thy show up like: URIBL_WS_SURBL and URIBL_OB_SURBL for example.
>
>> If I do need to add the rule,  what is the exact syntax to use for
>> 3.0??
>
> No need to do that.
>
>> My apologies if this has been covered before - my searches came up
>> pretty  empty.
>
> A grep inside your rules dir would have told ;)
>
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_SC_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   2
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_WS_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   4
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_PH_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   8
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_OB_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   16
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_AB_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   32
>
> Bye,
> Raymond.
>
>
> ------------------------------

While it's true that the rules are there, don't we have to add scores to
local.cf?  (I upgraded this AM, too).

Regards,
Alden




More information about the Discuss mailing list