[SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with SpamAssassin 3.0
alden at engineno9inc.com
alden at engineno9inc.com
Sun Sep 26 20:12:06 CEST 2004
> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond at prolocation.net>
> Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with
> SpamAssassin 3.0
> To: SURBL Discussion list <discuss at lists.surbl.org>
> Message-ID:
> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409261916300.22651 at mailbox.prolocation.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Hi!
>
>> I have been using the SURBL plugin with SA 2.64 successfully and have
>> just upgraded SA to 3.0. In the docs it states that it is best to
>> use multi.surbl.org with 3.0. Is this configured by default
>> somewhere or do I need to add the rule to local.cf??
>
> This is enabled by default, of you have modules like Net::DNS installed.
>
>> I have been watching the spam processed so far this morning and I am
>> getting hits on the lists I had configured with 2.64 but not multi
>> which is why I ask.
>
> You still see the hits on the seperate lists.
>
> Thy show up like: URIBL_WS_SURBL and URIBL_OB_SURBL for example.
>
>> If I do need to add the rule, what is the exact syntax to use for
>> 3.0??
>
> No need to do that.
>
>> My apologies if this has been covered before - my searches came up
>> pretty empty.
>
> A grep inside your rules dir would have told ;)
>
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_SC_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 2
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_WS_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 4
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_PH_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 8
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_OB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 16
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_AB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 32
>
> Bye,
> Raymond.
>
>
> ------------------------------
While it's true that the rules are there, don't we have to add scores to
local.cf? (I upgraded this AM, too).
Regards,
Alden
More information about the Discuss
mailing list