[SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with SpamAssassin 3.0

alden at engineno9inc.com alden at engineno9inc.com
Sun Sep 26 22:54:33 CEST 2004


>Hi!

>>> A grep inside your rules dir would have told ;)
>>>
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_SC_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   2
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_WS_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   4
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_PH_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   8
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_OB_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   16
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub   URIBL_AB_SURBL  multi.surbl.org.        A   32

>> While it's true that the rules are there, don't we have to add scores to
>> local.cf?  (I upgraded this AM, too).

>No, the scores are in the default rulesets. Again, a simple grep would
>have told you ;)

>[root at vmx01 spamassassin]# grep SURBL * | grep score
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_AB_SURBL 0 2.007 0 0.417
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_OB_SURBL 0 1.996 0 3.213
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_PH_SURBL 0 0.839 0 2.000
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_SC_SURBL 0 3.897 0 4.263
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462

>Bye,
>Raymond.

Yep.  Just realized it before I read this.  Sorry, and thanks!

--Alden




More information about the Discuss mailing list