[SURBL-Discuss] Question re: integration with SpamAssassin 3.0
alden at engineno9inc.com
alden at engineno9inc.com
Sun Sep 26 22:54:33 CEST 2004
>Hi!
>>> A grep inside your rules dir would have told ;)
>>>
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_SC_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 2
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_WS_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 4
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_PH_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 8
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_OB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 16
>>> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_AB_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 32
>> While it's true that the rules are there, don't we have to add scores to
>> local.cf? (I upgraded this AM, too).
>No, the scores are in the default rulesets. Again, a simple grep would
>have told you ;)
>[root at vmx01 spamassassin]# grep SURBL * | grep score
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_AB_SURBL 0 2.007 0 0.417
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_OB_SURBL 0 1.996 0 3.213
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_PH_SURBL 0 0.839 0 2.000
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_SC_SURBL 0 3.897 0 4.263
>50_scores.cf:score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462
>Bye,
>Raymond.
Yep. Just realized it before I read this. Sorry, and thanks!
--Alden
More information about the Discuss
mailing list