[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: SURBL inclusion policy

Frank Ellermann nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Sep 28 01:51:27 CEST 2004

Jeff Chan wrote:

> How does that sound?

Good.  A link to UC somewhere (not necessarily on this page)
would be also nice.  About the "age" problem:  Sometimes
spamvertized domains are used for weeks, more than 2 months
in the case of aktion2004.net.multi.surbl.org =

Some days ago I got a feedback mail from ICANN's WDPRS, it
was about a complaint in May.  So attacking domains on the
"whois data problem" track takes some time, certainly more
than 90 days.  At the moment Joe's idea "don't add anything
older than 90 days" probably works, but the spammers will
as always try to bypass any strict rules.

Therefore your wording ("should") is IMHO fine, bye, Frank

More information about the Discuss mailing list