[SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Tue Sep 28 03:43:16 CEST 2004

On Monday, September 27, 2004, 6:12:41 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> In another message about doubleclick you came to the conclusion
> to whitelist this stuff.  IMHO that's a bad idea.  There's no
> reason to whitelist somebody known for utter dubious business
> practices:  as long as they don't spam they won't show up in a
> SURBL, why waste your time or bandwidth for these [censored] ?

Doubleclick domains show up in a lot of hams.  Do we want to
block those hams?

Yes or no?

Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

More information about the Discuss mailing list