[SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Tue Sep 28 14:49:19 CEST 2004

On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:35:15 AM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> Doubleclick domains show up in a lot of hams.

> Have you seen these domains in URLs mentioned in e-mail ?

> 0mm.com   123 / 94 in *.net-abuse.* (incl. / excl. nanas),
>           last 2002. rather old, but not a "white hat".
> 2clk.net   93 / 25, last Aug 14 2004, zero sightings after
>           removing the dubious launch.2clk.net addresses

> businesslink.net  sightings in some very old spam (1999).

So what you're saying is that there are no recent NANAS.
IOW they're not spamming.

But that still does not answer the question, do they
get mentioned in a lot of hams?

The question is not about spams, it's about hams.

Asking the wrong question gets the wrong answer.

Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

More information about the Discuss mailing list