[SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net

Chris Santerre csanterre at merchantsoverseas.com
Tue Sep 28 16:03:32 CEST 2004

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Broens [mailto:surbl at alexb.ch]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:52 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to
>suesingle4y ou.net
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc at surbl.org]
>>>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:18 PM
>>>To: Frank Ellermann
>>>Cc: discuss at lists.surbl.org
>>>Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to
>>>suesingle4y ou.net
>>>On Monday, September 27, 2004, 5:12:16 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>>>>Jeff Chan wrote:
>>>>>"A. Add domains that appear only in spam. Do not add any
>>>>>domains that appear in ham."
>>>>As an absolute rule that won't work, because the criminal
>>>>spammer talks with his rogue registrar in "ham".
>>>I don't consider spammer's messages to be ham.  Only ham from
>>>legitimate people (non-spammers) is ordinary ham.
>>>Jeff C.
>>>"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
>> Oh yeah single4you.net is realy legit.... and I'm the queen 
>of England.
>> Their site is back up, with personal ads that show picts of 
>people. Too bad
>> one of the pics is snoop dog, and another is Conan the Barbarian!!

:-) I read the snoop dog and conan ones.

--Chris ( ilike ot play cricket chess)

More information about the Discuss mailing list