[SURBL-Discuss] RE: open redirect at US CONGRESS

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Apr 15 03:25:39 CEST 2005


On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 12:16:43 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alex Broens [mailto:surbl at alexb.ch]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:53 PM
>>To: SURBL Discussion list
>>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: open redirect at US CONGRESS
>>
>>
>>Chris Santerre wrote:
>>> LOL. I'm adding them all to my post to Spam-L. Hopefully 
>>that will wake a fe
>>> of them up before we have to add them to the gray list!
>>
>>Chris...
>>
>>Do you realize that you're giving out this info to spammers as well as 
>>spamfighters?

> Yup. I have my reasons :) 

>>
>>Shouldn't we just keep a low profile on this and possibly contact the 
>>admins of as many as possible and hope for them fixing?

> Been there, tried that. Doesn't work. 

>>
>>Although it would be nice to have these in rbldns zone, sorry, but the 
>>havoc these inclusions would cause are not worth trouble.

> No comment ;)

>>
>>Bayes, SA and SARE rules will take care of most cases without the need 
>>of driving eachother nuts.

> Think open mail relays. Unless you block, no one will fix. Gmail doesn't run
> and open relay, because it would be blocked. The logic for open redirs is no
> different. 

> --Chris 

If you want to discuss lists that don't have the same policies as
SURBLs, may I request that you please take it to another
discussion list so people don't think you're talking about
SURBLs?

Thanks,

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list