[SURBL-Discuss] RE: open redirect at US CONGRESS
jeffc at surbl.org
Fri Apr 15 03:25:39 CEST 2005
On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 12:16:43 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>From: Alex Broens [mailto:surbl at alexb.ch]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:53 PM
>>To: SURBL Discussion list
>>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: open redirect at US CONGRESS
>>Chris Santerre wrote:
>>> LOL. I'm adding them all to my post to Spam-L. Hopefully
>>that will wake a fe
>>> of them up before we have to add them to the gray list!
>>Do you realize that you're giving out this info to spammers as well as
> Yup. I have my reasons :)
>>Shouldn't we just keep a low profile on this and possibly contact the
>>admins of as many as possible and hope for them fixing?
> Been there, tried that. Doesn't work.
>>Although it would be nice to have these in rbldns zone, sorry, but the
>>havoc these inclusions would cause are not worth trouble.
> No comment ;)
>>Bayes, SA and SARE rules will take care of most cases without the need
>>of driving eachother nuts.
> Think open mail relays. Unless you block, no one will fix. Gmail doesn't run
> and open relay, because it would be blocked. The logic for open redirs is no
If you want to discuss lists that don't have the same policies as
SURBLs, may I request that you please take it to another
discussion list so people don't think you're talking about
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss