[SPAM-TAG] Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Redirectors and SURBLs

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Wed Apr 20 01:48:46 CEST 2005

On Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 10:22:50 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> Hash: SHA1

> Jeff Chan writes:
>> On Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 5:13:33 AM, Rakesh Rakesh wrote:
>> > But it fails to extract the "rdx56.info" from the redirector of Zdnet.
>> >  http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/howbad/rdx56.info/p/yo
>> > where rdx50.info is listed in JP, WS, OB and SC surbls
>> > I think we need to work on FQDN appearing as string in the url.
>> Indeed, that would be good general solution to the problem, if
>> somewhat resource intensive unless redirectors could specifically
>> be detected.  Otherwise checking every URI for additional domains
>> might perhaps require a lot of CPU.  It's probably a good
>> question for the SpamAssassin folks.

> Yeah.  I'd be much obliged if somebody could open a bugzilla ticket
> on http://bugzilla.SpamAssassin.org/ about this... we should fix
> it (somehow).

> - --j.

Hi Justin,
I'm pretty sure this is essentially the same as the nate.com
redirector ticket:


or at least it seems the solution might be similar.

Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

More information about the Discuss mailing list