[SURBL-Discuss] Testing: xs.surbl.org (CBL Data)
david.hooton at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 06:17:35 CEST 2005
On 4/22/05, Alex Broens <surbl at alexb.ch> wrote:
> > If this trend continues, IMHO, to be useful, XL needs to be more
> > aggressively tuned.
> Similar results here. In a few cases which XS trapped something new, SBL
> had it as well, 10 minutes later it was in multi - usually JP.
> Definitely no FPs.
Working very nicely here, we're tuning the score up a bit on it now.
I'd say this is definately production worthy, although as suggested
previously I wouldn't mind seeing what happens if it were made
slightly more agressive.
More information about the Discuss