[SURBL-Discuss] XS hits
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Apr 24 10:09:14 CEST 2005
On Sunday, April 24, 2005, 12:40:21 AM, Paul Shields wrote:
> Don't forget though that we have many custom SA rulesets, and thresholds
> that can be applied per mailbox, so my ham to spam ratio is not necessarily
> going to reflect a 'stock' install (this is ham or spam as defined by a
> variable threshold, not by someone actually identifying the message!).
Aha, good to know. Still, in aggregate it's interesting data,
and the differences between datasets look approximately as
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss