[SURBL-Discuss] XS hits

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Apr 24 10:09:14 CEST 2005


On Sunday, April 24, 2005, 12:40:21 AM, Paul Shields wrote:
> Don't forget though that we have many custom SA rulesets, and thresholds
> that can be applied per mailbox, so my ham to spam ratio is not necessarily 
> going to reflect a 'stock' install (this is ham or spam as defined by a 
> variable threshold, not by someone actually identifying the message!).

> Paul

Aha, good to know.  Still, in aggregate it's interesting data,
and the differences between datasets look approximately as
expected.

Cheers,

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list