[SURBL-Discuss] "surgically" blocking certain redirectors
Chris Santerre
csanterre at MerchantsOverseas.com
Tue Apr 26 22:08:40 CEST 2005
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob McEwen [mailto:rob at powerviewsystems.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:56 AM
>To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] "surgically" blocking certain redirectors
>
>
>Jeff said:
>"It is possible to blacklist nina.18.to but not 18.to if nina
>is owned by
>spammers but 18 is not."
>
>Why not then add certain redirectors to the SURBL lists where
>the redirector
>is deemed to NOT be found in hams? Specifically, I'm referring
>to situations
>where we could list redirect.somedomain.com but NOT list somedomain.com
>
>Rob McEwen
There will be a SARE ruleset out shortly that will tag these redirectors.
You can then score to taste.
The Ninjas do it again!!
--Chris
More information about the Discuss
mailing list