[SURBL-Discuss] "surgically" blocking certain redirectors

Chris Santerre csanterre at MerchantsOverseas.com
Tue Apr 26 22:08:40 CEST 2005

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob McEwen [mailto:rob at powerviewsystems.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:56 AM
>To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] "surgically" blocking certain redirectors
>Jeff said:
>"It is possible to blacklist nina.18.to but not 18.to if nina 
>is owned by
>spammers but 18 is not."
>Why not then add certain redirectors to the SURBL lists where 
>the redirector
>is deemed to NOT be found in hams? Specifically, I'm referring 
>to situations
>where we could list redirect.somedomain.com but NOT list somedomain.com
>Rob McEwen

There will be a SARE ruleset out shortly that will tag these redirectors.
You can then score to taste. 

The Ninjas do it again!!


More information about the Discuss mailing list