[SURBL-Discuss] One way to handle the Geocities spam

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Dec 1 12:18:58 CET 2005


On Thursday, December 1, 2005, 1:58:39 AM, John Graham-Cumming wrote:
> Jeff Chan wrote:

>> It would require rewriting SURBL applications
>> and some work on the data side also.  It would also require a way
>> to signal that paths should be checked and at what level in the
>> query (i.e., what subdomain level) the path information is
>> encoded. 

> All true, but I think the SURBL data itself would be backwards 
> compatible with users who don't implement the geocities code since 
> they'd just check geocities.com against the SURBL and come up ok.

Yes, it probably would be backward compatible for most
applications. 

Jeff C.
--
Don't harm innocent bystanders.



More information about the Discuss mailing list