[SURBL-Discuss] FP rate?

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Feb 13 04:04:04 CET 2005


On Saturday, February 12, 2005, 3:54:42 PM, Alain Alain wrote:
> Given that it's for me rather easy to implement a "scoring"
> combination from the different lists and that this is easy to
> configure.  (I suspect most end-users will understand that and that
> it's easy to "publish" new recommended weigth's.)  I think "at least
> 2" could be the default, without generating FP's (or almost none). 
> The main filtering app that I write a plugin  for (spampal) has nice
> whitelisting, but this needs a few weeks use before being really
> active.

If you're looking for weights to apply to different lists, you
may want to consider starting with the ones SpamAssassin uses.

Regarding your general question of reducing FPs by conjoining
list, I agree that could be useful but haven't had a chance to
try it yet.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list