[SURBL-Discuss] FP rate?
Jeff Chan
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Feb 13 04:04:04 CET 2005
On Saturday, February 12, 2005, 3:54:42 PM, Alain Alain wrote:
> Given that it's for me rather easy to implement a "scoring"
> combination from the different lists and that this is easy to
> configure. (I suspect most end-users will understand that and that
> it's easy to "publish" new recommended weigth's.) I think "at least
> 2" could be the default, without generating FP's (or almost none).
> The main filtering app that I write a plugin for (spampal) has nice
> whitelisting, but this needs a few weeks use before being really
> active.
If you're looking for weights to apply to different lists, you
may want to consider starting with the ones SpamAssassin uses.
Regarding your general question of reducing FPs by conjoining
list, I agree that could be useful but haven't had a chance to
try it yet.
Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
More information about the Discuss
mailing list