[SURBL-Discuss] FP rate?

[Jeff Chan]

On Monday, February 14, 2005, 11:59:04 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:43:35PM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> > Oh I agree. I don't know what is causing it, but I know it must be throwing
>> > off the reported FP rate. Although proably for all the URIRBLs. I'd love to
>> > get a monthly report from DQ on his rates. But I know he is busy. 
>> 
>> All our mass-check results are available via anonymous rsync.  Feel free to
>> generate some statistics. ;)

> This could be tested quite easily, if anyone has the tuits...

>   1. do a network mass-check of the SURBL rules.
>   2. restart named, in case it's a named-cache issue (unlikely)
>   3. do another with exactly the same corpus.
>   4. diff the logs.

Assuming the test platform we happen to use gets the problem.

Does anyone have enough info to make a report to the Net::DNS
folks?

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."