[SURBL-Discuss] RE: quick poll on SURBL hit %

Raymond Dijkxhoorn raymond at prolocation.net
Wed Jan 5 21:21:36 CET 2005


Hi!

> Okay, let me give you some real numbers from our inhouse mail for the
> last week..  As you can see, half the top rules are network tests, so
> people running without them (-L) are really missing out..
>
> TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RANK    RULE NAME                       COUNT %OFRULES  %OFMAIL  %OFSPAM
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   1    URIBL_SBL                        1739     6.66%  50.71%  85.04%
>   2    HTML_MESSAGE                     1586     6.07%  46.25%  77.56%
>   3    URIBL_WS_SURBL                   1447     5.54%  42.20%  70.76%
>   4    URIBL_JP_SURBL                   1373     5.26%  40.04%  67.14%
>   5    URIBL_OB_SURBL                   1364     5.22%  39.78%  66.70%

Ok, let me throw in some of todays stats:

SpamAssassin tag hits: (top 100)
#1	138010	URIBL_WS_SURBL
#2	136326	URIBL_JP_SURBL
#3	133633	URIBL_SBL
#4	121139	URIBL_OB_SURBL
#5	110524	RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
#6	102344	BAYES_99
#7	93535	HTML_MESSAGE
#8	77539	URIBL_SC_SURBL
#9	45440	MIME_HTML_ONLY
#10	42655	URIBL_AB_SURBL
#11	36296	MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER
#12	34328	MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
#13	33857	RCVD_IN_XBL
#14	32572	RCVD_IN_SBL
#15	30595	RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
#16	30219	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
#17	29376	RCVD_IN_DSBL
#18	28708	URIBL_AH_DNSBL
#19	27559	RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
#20	25614	DRUGS_ERECTILE
#21	23087	MPART_ALT_DIFF
#22	22513	RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
#23	21421	PROLO_STOCK_FWDLOOK
#24	19968	MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS
#25	18367	RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB

Spam found           : 185036 (24.81%)

Has been worse, we have seen 40% at times.

Bye,
Raymond.


More information about the Discuss mailing list