[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals

Darrell (support at invariantsystems.com) darrell_list at dlanalyzer.com
Sun Jan 30 20:34:06 CET 2005

> Hi!
> > Unfortuantly right now Declude does not support bitmasking so we end up
> > having to do a bunch of workarounds when using the multi list.
> Its not like this should come as a surprise, this 'change' was talked over
> before SA3 hit the streets and was also ment to be moved into 3.1 like we
> are now talking over. Wonder why this wasnt picked up earlier by the
> Declude people.
> Are those workarounds hard or will it mean people with Declude have to
> stop using JP datasets... ?

We have (Users of Declude) have been hoping for native bitmask support for a
while.  Hoepfully, this is something that will be coming soon.  We (users of
declude) will still be able to take advantage of the JP datasets when the
change is made.  The workarounds are not that hard.


More information about the Discuss mailing list